Did the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak affect the quality of acute stroke care? (Data from across the country).

Introduction: The aim of our study was to determine whether the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the quality of acute care of stroke. Methods: Data from the stroke register at the National Health Information Centre were analysed. Clinical data from two time periods (the first wave: March-April 2020; the second wave: October-November 2020) were compared using an independent sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two sample rank-sum test. Results: The total number of patients admitted with stroke during the second wave of COVID-19 was 1848, versus 1698 in the first wave. The proportion of patients treated by IVT was similar in both waves (275 (20.7%) vs 333 (22.1%), p = 1, difference in location: -0,0003, 95% CI: -5.0 to 5.95). We found no difference in time from the onset of symptoms to treatment (median = 130 min in both waves, p = 0.52, difference in location: 3.99, 95% CI: -6.0 to 14.0), nor in the door-to-needle time (median = 29 vs 30 min, p = 0.08, difference in location: -2.99, 95% CI: -5.0 to 0.008) between the first and the second waves of the pandemic. We found no difference in NIHSS (median = 3 vs 4, p = 0.51, difference in location: 0.00007, 95% CI: -0.9 to 0.000006) and mRS (median = 3 in both waves, p = 0.60, difference in location: -0.00004, 95% CI: -0.00004 to 0.00003) at discharge from hospital between the two periods. Conclusion: The severity of the COVID-19 outbreak did not affect the quality of acute stroke care in Slovakia.

The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on acute stroke care in Slovakia: Data from across the country.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A few studies using data from regional databases have recently pointed to a decreased number of patients with stroke. The aim of the present study was to describe country-level data (the number of patients with stroke, the proportion of patients with acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), the proportion of patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] or mechanical thrombectomy [MT], the door-to-needle times [DNT], and the onset-to-needle time [ONT]) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovakia. METHODS: The study examined data from the stroke register at the National Health Information Centre. Data from three time periods (March to April 2020; March to April 2019; January to February 2020) were compared using an independent samples t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test. RESULTS: The number of stroke patients admitted to hospitals in Slovakia during the COVID-19 period showed a decrease (1673 vs. 2328 in period 2 and 2155 in period 3). The proportions of patients with TIA remained the same in periods 1 and 2 (9.7% vs. 11.7%) and in periods 1 and 3 (9.7 vs. 11.8%). The percentage of patients treated with IVT during the pandemic (22.4%) did not differ from period 2 (20.0%) or period 3 (21.4%). No difference was found in the rate of MT between the COVID-19 period (10.2%) and the same period in 2019 (10.7%) and in January to February 2020 (13.1%). The median DNT remained unchanged in periods 1 (30 min), 2 (35 min) and 3 (30 min), and no differences were found in median ONT in periods 1 (130 min), 2 (130 min) and 3 (140 min). CONCLUSION: We found a decreased number of stroke patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in Slovakia, but no evidence of a change in the quality of acute stroke care.